Papers with BIG-Bench tasks
Transcending Scaling Laws with 0.1% Extra Compute (2023.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
Yi Tay, Jason Wei, Hyung Chung, Vinh Tran, David So, Siamak Shakeri, Xavier Garcia, Steven Zheng, Jinfeng Rao, Aakanksha Chowdhery, Denny Zhou, Donald Metzler, Slav Petrov, Neil Houlsby, Quoc Le, Mostafa Dehghani
| Challenge: | Existing scaling of language models is expensive and requires significant computational costs. |
| Approach: | They propose a method that substantially improves existing language models and their scaling curves with a relatively tiny amount of extra compute. |
| Outcome: | The proposed method significantly improves existing language models and their scaling curves with a relatively tiny amount of extra compute. |
Can ChatGPT Defend its Belief in Truth? Evaluating LLM Reasoning via Debate (2023.findings-emnlp)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Large language models (LLMs) have shown impressive performance in complex reasoning tasks, but it is difficult to know whether they are reasoning based on deep understandings of truth and logic or leveraging their vast previously-seen patterns in a relatively shallow way. |
| Approach: | They propose to test large language models by engaging with them in a debate-like conversation where the user and LLM need to discuss to make the correct decision starting from opposing arguments. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model can achieve the correct answer on its own, but can also hold and defend its belief instead of blindly believing or getting misled by the user’s (invalid) arguments and critiques. |
Challenging BIG-Bench Tasks and Whether Chain-of-Thought Can Solve Them (2023.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
Mirac Suzgun, Nathan Scales, Nathanael Schärli, Sebastian Gehrmann, Yi Tay, Hyung Won Chung, Aakanksha Chowdhery, Quoc Le, Ed Chi, Denny Zhou, Jason Wei
| Challenge: | Language models have already made good progress on this benchmark, with the best model outperforming average reported human-rater results on 65% of the BIG-Bench tasks. |
| Approach: | They propose to use chain-of-thought prompting to challenge language models on 23 challenging BIG-Bench tasks which they call BIG-Bench Hard. |
| Outcome: | The proposed language models outperform the average human-rater on 65% of the BIG-Bench tasks. |